Half-Day Live Course · 29 September 2026 Live writing of your ERC Starting Grant Part I and Part II under coaching from a former ERC evaluator. This lab works directly on your proposal draft — not on generic templates.
Half-Day Live Course · 29 September 2026
Live writing of your ERC Starting Grant Part I and Part II under coaching from a former ERC evaluator. This lab works directly on your proposal draft — not on generic templates.
Date: Tuesday, 29 September 2026
Time: 09:30 – 13:00 CET
Format: Live workshop on Zoom
Price: EUR 350
In ERC Starting Grant evaluation, the risk-novelty positioning can determine the ranking in a single sentence.
The synopsis must convince evaluators that the project is genuinely ambitious, scientifically original, and worth funding at frontier-research level. Methodology and feasibility matter — but mostly at Step 2. Step 1 depends heavily on how convincingly the project vision is framed.
This live 3.5-hour workshop focuses on rewriting and strengthening:
Part I
Part II
The risk-novelty framing
The PI track-record narrative
You work directly on your own proposal with evaluator-style coaching, mark-ups, and positioning strategies tailored to the ERC Starting Grant structure.
You leave with:
A stronger synopsis
A clearer risk-novelty statement
Better Step 2 methodology framing
A more strategic PI narrative
A stronger institutional support story
A free pre-submission evaluation before submission
This is live proposal work, not a lecture.
An early-career Principal Investigator between 2 and 10 years post-PhD
A university or research office supporting an ERC Starting Grant candidate
Ready to bring:
A research idea
A research question
A draft Part I outline
The candidate falls outside the ERC Starting Grant eligibility window
No host institution has yet been identified
In that case, the introductory webinar is the better place to confirm fit and eligibility.
Live restructuring and rewriting of the two key proposal sections.
A sharper and more defensible risk-novelty sentence designed to strengthen ranking potential.
Methodology and feasibility positioning aligned with ERC Step 2 expectations.
A stronger presentation of achievements, independence, and research trajectory within the 0–10 year window.
A clearer institutional support narrative that signals genuine backing.
A budget strategy aligned with the ERC Starting Grant funding envelope.
40 min
30 min
40 min
30 min
25 min
15 min
Every participant receives one free in-depth evaluation of their complete ERC proposal before submission.
Delivered approximately 10 days before submission
Booked after the workshop
Included in the EUR 350 fee
You also receive:
Full workshop recording (available for 30 days)
Free pre-submission evaluation session
EU funding consultant since 2002 with more than 20 years of experience as a European Commission evaluator across H2020, Horizon Europe, and EIC programmes.
50,000+ researchers and innovation actors trained
Experience across 45+ countries
Ranked among the top Google results for EU funding expertise
No copy-paste template.
No guarantee of funding success.
No proxy writing service.
Your proposal remains your own work — professionally reviewed, challenged, and strengthened.
If the project’s risk-novelty positioning cannot yet be defended convincingly in writing, you will be told directly during the first hour and refunded on the spot.
No. Three sections at first-draft level are enough. Bring what you have.
Yes. Two named participants are included per ticket. Additional seats are EUR 100 each.
Yes. The recording is sent within 24 hours and remains available for 30 days. Your draft is never shared.
You may transfer your seat to the next cohort of the same course at no additional cost.
Full refund up to 7 days before the event. After that, your ticket may be transferred to the next cohort or to a colleague.
Email: nf@cyberall-access.com